A jersey patch has created controversy within Chilliwack FC.

Members of CFC鈥檚 women鈥檚 premier team say the youth soccer club has punished them for wearing an LGBTQI2S+ and BIPOC symbol on their uniform.

LGBTQI2S+ is a term that stands for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer (or questioning), intersex, and two-spirit and BIPOC stands for black, Indigenous and people of colour.

The team鈥檚 players wanted to show support for marginalized, underrepresented groups and met with the CFC board to present the idea. According to Brandon Lupton, a team supporter and partner to one of the players, the club expressed concern that the suggested patch could be negatively received and suggested that 鈥淐hilliwack isn鈥檛 ready.鈥�

CFC chairperson Andrea Laycock said the conversation was more nuanced than that.

She said that while the board expressed support for the concepts of inclusivity and diversity, they felt a CFC jersey wasn鈥檛 the right place to make a political statement.

CFC鈥檚 adult liasion, Richard Tagle, said that following the initial meeting, his daughter Megan Tagle and three players from the women鈥檚 team worked to come up with an alternative. They produced three words, 鈥楻espect for ALL,鈥� which could be used on jerseys, used as a #hashtag on Twitter, and utilized in other ways.

鈥淭hree players had a long discussion with Megan and I,鈥� Tagle said. 鈥淎fter that meeting, I met with the three plus the captain of the Div 1 team to discuss the proposal. The five of us came to an agreement to begin with 鈥淩espect for ALL鈥� on the jersey, and the three would begin an educational video program on our website and social media to take steps to move towards an symbol to be placed on the jersey.

鈥淎t no time were we in disagreement with a symbol, but solely on the speed at which we would proceed. Again, all five were in agreement and I took that back to the board for approval.鈥�

Laycock thought it was a 鈥済ood first step,鈥� and CFC planned to have the words on 1,200 jerseys in the association.

They still do.

But in the end the women鈥檚 players weren鈥檛 satisfied and didn鈥檛 think the alternative went as far as they wanted. They opted to wear their preferred option on the sleeve of their jerseys.

That decision had immediate consequences.

鈥淎fter just one game, complaints from a bystander made their way to the chairperson of Chilliwack FC (Andrea Laycock),鈥� Lupton explained. 鈥淔orty eight hours after the team鈥檚 first game, they received an email stating that the board requested a meeting with them to discuss disciplinary action for the embellishment of the uniform.鈥�

A few days after the meeting, Lupton said three players received a two-game suspension and a warning of further discipline (longer suspension, or revoking of membership) if the misconduct continued.

The players appealed the ruling on the grounds of unfair and excessive disciplinary action, offering to accept a one game suspension.

Their appeal was denied.

Laycock said the players would have run afoul of the board putting anything on their jerseys, and the two-game suspension was upheld because their attempt to circumvent the wishes of the CFC board was 鈥渄eliberate and premeditated.鈥�

She said nothing would have been done if the patch had appeared on hoodies or track pants or shoes.

鈥淏ut our policy is pretty clear that nothing goes on the jerseys without board approval,鈥� she said. 鈥淲e are open to changing that, but it has to fall in line with our policies and our mandate of having kids on the field playing soccer. It鈥檚 not that the board doesn鈥檛 support the idea of having a patch or a flag, but we have to be mindful of how we approach it and respect the community.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not incumbent on the executive to impose our political and personal beliefs on the membership. We have to be mindful of everybody鈥檚 needs.鈥�

Tagle said CFC had no issue with the symbol itself, beyond its presence on the jerseys.

鈥淭he symbol could have been advertising for Chilliwack Ford or a cross or anything and we would have had the same issue,鈥� he noted. 鈥淲hat is placed on the jersey, including colours, is solely the board鈥檚 decision. This is to prevent symbols of hate, religion, adverts, etc. being placed on the jersey.

鈥淭his has nothing to do with what this particular symbol represents.鈥�

Lupton said the advocate players requested that the uniform policy be changed, with a policy amendment proposal submitted to include wearing symbols supporting social justice and commemoration, for example.

鈥淭his request has not yet been acknowledged by Chilliwack FC executive board,鈥� he noted.

Lupton said the situation is particularly frustrating with professional sport leagues such as the NCAA, NBA, and NFL supporting the use of patches and stickers related to social justice issues.

鈥淎 community soccer club鈥檚 decision to punish players for showing support for statements that align with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and genuine human inclusion is unacceptable,鈥� Lupton said. 鈥淭he unprofessional handling and conduct of this issue by the Chilliwack FC board is appalling and needs to be acknowledged to create change.鈥�

Laycock said CFC board felt strongly that 鈥楻espect for ALL鈥� would get a conversation started, and the board stands by their choice.

鈥淭he words can represent LGBTQI2S+ and BIPOC, but they can also be applied to 101 things like respect for your opponents, your teammates, officials, your community,鈥� Laycock said. 鈥淲e felt it was a good first step and an opportunity to grow and educate as we continue.鈥�

eric.welsh@theprogress.com
Like us on and follow us on .

Want to support local journalism during the pandemic? Make a donation